- The inspector wrongly assumed the regular management fee instead of the reduced fee actually paid.
- X provides management services for A bv.
- The management fee was reduced when A bv came under financial supervision.
- X included the reduced fee in the VAT returns for 2015 and 2016.
- The inspector claims that the regular fee should be considered as invoiced.
- X argues that VAT is only due on the actual invoiced revenue.
- The court ruled in favor of the inspector, but the higher court overturned the decision.
- The higher court states that the actual invoiced amount should be used when a lower amount is charged.
- X’s appeal is successful.
Source: taxlive.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Automated processing of VAT returns does not create legitimate expectations
- No VAT refund where supply of services for consideration is not established
- Dutch Court Denies Input VAT Deduction for Olympic Equestrian Project Without Taxable Supplies
- Dutch Court Upholds Extrapolated VAT Assessments Based on Hidden Records
- Netherlands: Shadow Accounting Triggers Reversed Burden of Proof and VAT Assessments














