- The case concerned VAT for 2017–2021, specifically the place of supply for interactive online educational services and the right to input tax deduction.
- The taxpayer was based in Switzerland, while instructors taught from abroad and most students lived abroad.
- The Federal Administrative Court held that the taxpayer’s Swiss registered office determines the place of supply, following Federal Supreme Court precedent.
- Online materials and occasional in-person instruction in France were treated as part of one overall service, or at most as ancillary to the main service.
- The taxpayer’s appeal was dismissed.
Source: bvger.weblaw.ch
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Switzerland"
- Deactivation of VAT Accounting Easy and Migration to VAT Return Pro
- Top 10 Swiss VAT Audit Risks and Key Compliance Areas
- FTA Launches New Centralised Online Services Portal
- “MWST-Abrechnung easy” Discontinued: Users Must Switch to “MWST-Abrechnung pro”
- Switzerland Issues Electronic EUR.1 Certificates for EU Trade from March 2026: Key Changes for Companies














