- Court ruling on the right to deduct VAT for fixed asset reconstruction
- Case involves a dispute over a tax administrator’s decision
- Applicant’s right to deduct VAT for reconstruction and services was denied
- Local tax administrator claimed assets were transferred without remuneration
- Supreme Administrative Court questioned the applicant’s intention for taxable activity
- No obligation to adjust VAT deduction was raised
- Core dispute centered on the intention to use assets in taxable activity
- Objective evidence from the tax audit was crucial in the case
Source: vatabout.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Lithuania"
- Lithuanian Court Clarifies VAT Liability, Tax Relief Abuse, and Deductibility of Construction Costs
- Lithuania Updates VAT Registration, Deregistration and Small Business Scheme Procedures
- Amendments to Lithuanian VAT Law: Changes to Articles 41, 42, 43, 51, 12, 122, 132, 78, 881
- Lithuania Cuts VAT to 5% for Robotic Surgical Instruments and Accessories, Effective March 2026
- Draft Legislative Proposal Submitted to the Seimas – Implications for VAT Digitalisation
