- The Lithuanian Supreme Administrative Court ruled that the applicant could not deduct construction and improvement costs for Personal Income Tax due to insufficient supporting documentation.
- The applicant was denied Primary Residence Tax Relief because they only formally declared residence without actually living in the properties, constituting abuse of rights.
- The court clarified that under a joint activity agreement, the applicant was the sole taxable person for VAT, as they independently conducted the economic activity.
- The applicant failed to declare and pay VAT on income from real estate resale, and attempts to obtain tax benefits through formal declarations were rejected.
Source: vatabout.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Lithuania"
- EU Finance Ministers Discuss VAT Data Access, Market Integration, Ukraine Aid, and Anti-Fraud Measures
- Commentary on the Law of Value Added Tax of the Republic of Lithuania (2004–2026)
- Lithuania Extends Cash Register Model Examination Deadline and Clarifies Compliance Procedures to 2028
- ECJ VAT C-544/24 (Nekilnojamojo turto valdymas) – Judgment – Fixed default VAT interest acceptable, does not violate proportionality
- Lithuania Updates VAT Registration, Deregistration and Small Business Scheme Procedures













