The Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that when substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other then the cause of substantial justice shall be preferred. The Two-member bench comprising of Beena Pillai (Judicial member) and Laxmi Prasad Sahu (Accountant member) held that when substantial justice and technical consideration are pitted against each other, the cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred, for the other side cannot claim to have vested right for injustice being done because of nondeliberate delay
Read More: Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- High Court Clarifies GST Treatment of Corporate Guarantees Without Consideration
- West Bengal AAR Rejects Hotel ITC Advance Ruling Over Pending GST Proceedings
- IMS vs Purchase Register: GST Reconciliation Guide
- Rajasthan AAAR: Compostable Bags Taxable at 5% Only if Biodegradable
- Tamil Nadu AAR: GST on Foreign Director’s Commission, Export Agents Exempt, C&F Taxable
