This is another single versus multiply case where the taxpayer is running effectively a two- pronged argument. The first argument is trying to argue the beneficial supplies (i.e zero and reduced rated items) are not part of an overall exempt supply. Having lost this, the even harder argument is trying to argue that those elements should still be carved out of the exemption and taxed differently.
Source KPMG
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- HMRC Guidance: Business entertainment (VAT Notice 700/65)
- HMRC Guidance: Admission charges to cultural events (VAT Notice 701/47)
- HMRC Guidance: VAT rates on different goods and services
- Chefs Urge VAT Cut to Ease Restaurant Cost Pressures
- HMRC Updates VAT Recovery Rules for Defined Benefit Pension Schemes
