The Court of Appeal in ‘s-Hertogenbosch ruled on appeal that there was manifestly improper management of X, who was formally and de facto director of the BVs. The inability to pay was reported much too late and no defense was presented as to why this could not be attributed to him.
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Refund Request Denied Due to Late Submission: Court of Appeal Decision 2025
- Pension Fund’s Insurance Service Exempt from VAT; No Right to Input Tax Deduction
- VAT Assessment Upheld Due to Missing Invoices and Insufficient Proof for Deductions and Loans
- Fiscal Unity for VAT Due to Close Financial and Economic Ties Upheld by Court
- EU Court: Spain Must Grant VAT Exemption for Group-Provided Cleaning Services to Members
