Request for a preliminary ruling from the BFH of 07.05.2020, submitted on 22.07.2020, on the following questions:
1. In the case of a one-off and therefore not period-related service, does the occasion for successive billing or payments within the meaning of Art. 64 (1) VAT Directive already result from the agreement of payment in installments?
2. In the alternative, if the first question is answered in the negative: Is a non-payment within the meaning of Article 90 (1) of the VAT Directive to be assumed if the taxpayer agrees in the performance of his service that this is to be remunerated in five annual installments and national law in the event of a later payment provides for a correction that reverses the previous reduction in the tax base under this provision?
Source: bundesfinanzhof.de
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Transfer Pricing, VAT and Transactions Between Related Entities: Key Principles from CJEU Case Law (Stellantis Portugal, C‑603/24)
- EU ViDA Implementation Strategy: Six Implementing Acts Shaping DRR, VIES and OSS Roll-Out (2027–2030)
- Comments on ECJ C-603/24 (Stellantis Portugal) – Transfer pricing and VAT: Court confirms in Stellantis that not every true-up constitutes a service
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – 3 Judgments till June 25, 2026
- EGC VAT Case T-231/26 (Agenzia delle Entrate Direzione Provinciale Genoval) – Questions – VAT deductibility of general expenses for auctioneers under margin scheme
