- A South African tax court ruling favored SARS and may affect companies using alternative VAT apportionment methods.
- The court rejected a financial services provider’s transaction-based method, requiring a mixed turnover-based approach instead.
- The taxpayer lost because it failed to provide strong empirical evidence that its proposed method was fair and reasonable.
- The ruling shows that alternative methods must be supported by detailed, auditable data—not just by a higher VAT recovery outcome.
- Companies seeking or using alternative apportionment methods may now face stricter scrutiny and need more robust documentation.
Source: pressreader.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "South Africa"
- Nine Charged in R3.99 Million VAT Refund Fraud Case
- South Africa’s VAT Modernization: How Businesses Should Prepare
- Fourteen Arrested in R3.99 Million VAT Refund Fraud Scheme
- South Africa’s Digital VAT Future: Key Decisions in Modernization
- Revoked PACs in Mexico: What to Do and How to Protect Your Invoicing













