Summary
- A recent Dutch VAT case confirms that the margin scheme cannot be applied to returned goods where the supplier previously exercised the right to deduct input VAT on the original acquisition. The judgment reinforces the fundamental principle that the margin scheme is intended to prevent double taxation on second-hand goods only where no prior VAT deduction has taken place. If input VAT has already been recovered, the conditions for applying the special margin scheme are not met, even if the goods are subsequently returned and resold. This interpretation is consistent with the EU VAT Directive and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union governing the scope of the special scheme for second-hand goods.
- The case highlights that businesses dealing in returned goods cannot assume that such goods automatically qualify for the margin scheme. The decisive factor is the VAT history of the goods rather than their physical condition or the fact that they have re-entered stock. Where the supplier deducted input VAT at the time of purchase, a subsequent resale must generally follow the normal VAT rules. Applying the margin scheme in these circumstances would result in an unintended tax advantage and would undermine the neutrality of the VAT system. Businesses should therefore maintain clear records demonstrating whether input VAT has been deducted before determining the appropriate VAT treatment upon resale.
- The judgment serves as a reminder that the margin scheme is a narrowly interpreted exception to the normal VAT regime. Companies engaged in retail, second-hand trading, or reverse logistics should carefully review the VAT status of returned goods before resale, ensuring that their accounting systems correctly distinguish between goods eligible for the margin scheme and those that remain subject to the standard VAT rules. Failure to do so may result in additional VAT assessments, interest, and penalties.
Article
The article discusses a Dutch VAT decision confirming that returned goods cannot be resold under the margin scheme where input VAT on the original acquisition has already been deducted. It explains that eligibility for the margin scheme depends on the VAT history of the goods rather than the fact that they have been returned. The ruling aligns with established CJEU case law that limits the margin scheme to situations where previous input VAT has not been recovered, reinforcing the need for businesses to maintain robust VAT records when processing returns and second-hand goods.
Sources
- BTW Jurisprudentie — Geen toepassing van de margeregeling op retourgoederen met afgetrokken voorbelasting — https://btwjurisprudentie.nl/geen-toepassing-van-de-margeregeling-op-retourgoederen-met-afgetrokken-voorbelasting/
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Additional VAT Assessment for Private Use of Company Cars Upheld, but Penalty Reduced
- Office-to-Hotel Conversion Does Not Create a Newly Manufactured Building for VAT Purposes
- VAT Assessment for Private Use of Company Cars; Penalty Reduced from 80% to 25%
- Dutch VAT Reform Clarifies Reverse Charge Rules Under ViDA Directive
- Dutch Attitudes Toward Ending Reduced VAT on Floriculture Products













