- CJEU considered whether Dutch pension funds qualified as ‘special investment funds’ (SIFs)
- Pension funds must be comparable to UCITS to qualify as SIFs
- Investment risk borne by members must be comparable to UCITS investors
- Benefits must depend primarily on investment performance
- National court to assess if members bear sufficient investment risk
- Principle of fiscal neutrality requires comparison to other SIFs in EU member states
Source: taxscape.deloitte.com
See also
- ECJ C-639/22 & others – Judgment – Interpretation of VAT exemption for pension funds
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Focus on Exemption – Management of special investment funds (Art. 135(1)(g))
- Other comments on ECJ C-639/22
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJEU Confirms TP Adjustments as VAT-Applicable Services, Requires Supporting Documentation
- Court of Justice Rules on VAT for Intra-Group Services and Evidence Requirements for Deductions
- ECJ Rules Compensation Payments in Transfer Pricing as Taxable Supply for VAT Purposes
- ECJ Rules Non-Transactional Profit Adjustments by Principal Are VAT-Applicable Services in Arcomet Case
- Understanding VAT Implications on Transfer Pricing: Insights from Arcomet Case C-726/23
