- ECJ ruled that transfer pricing adjustments by a principal company are services subject to VAT.
- The ruling was made in the Arcomet Towercranes case on 4 September 2025.
- Charges ensuring an operating company’s profit margin within an arm’s length range are considered remuneration for services.
- Tax authorities can request additional evidence to verify services supplied and used for taxable activities.
- Arcomet Belgium, the parent company, issued equalization invoices to Arcomet Romania without VAT.
- Romanian tax authorities denied VAT deductions on some invoices and collected additional VAT on others.
- The Court of Appeal in Bucharest referred questions to the ECJ about VAT application and documentation requirements.
- The Advocate-General confirmed that invoiced amounts are payments for services within VAT scope and supported additional documentation requirements.
Source: taxathand.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU Customs Reform: Data Hub, Trusted Traders and New Import Models
- Flashback on ECJ Cases C-409/98 (Mirror Group) – Tenant inducements are not exempt property letting
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Focus on Place of Supply of Intra-Community Acquisitions – ”Triangulation” (Art. 42)
- Roadtrip through ECJ cases: Focus on Promotional activities/Discounts (Art. 79, 87, 90(1))
- EU and China Agree Trade Understandings on Tariffs, Hybrid Vehicles and Market Access
