- Case GHTZ v FC of T involves a Victorian motor dealer, Mr. Peters, and his luxury car tax obligations
- Mr. Peters sold luxury cars to other dealers without selling directly to end-users
- Legal questions arose regarding tax evasion and entitlement to LCT adjustments
- Deputy President BW Rayment OAM KC presided over the case
Source: ato.gov.au
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Australia"
- Australia-UAE Free Trade Agreement Comes Into Effect
- Australia Establishes E-Invoicing as Default in Federal Procurement
- Australia Proposes GST Updates for Copyright and Digital Media to Modernize Tax Frameworks
- ATO Proposes New GST Rules for Copyright and Multimedia Transactions in Australia
- Australia Sets 2026 Deadline for Mandatory E-Invoicing with Government Agencies
