- X entered into an agreement with B regarding the sale of newly built houses.
- B guaranteed to purchase any unsold houses at a fixed price.
- X issued an invoice to B in 2013, charging 19% VAT.
- The houses were delivered in 2014.
- The general VAT rate was increased from 19% to 21% on October 1, 2012.
- An transitional arrangement was introduced for houses sold under agreements made before April 28, 2012, with payment in installments.
- The old VAT rate of 19% applies to installments due before October 1, 2013.
- The tax authority did not apply the transitional arrangement and imposed VAT.
- The Court of Appeal ruled that the transitional arrangement does not apply to the agreement between X and B.
- The Supreme Court upheld the ruling, stating that the transitional arrangement only applies to agreements for the sale of houses, not agreements for the exercise of a sales option.
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Parcel from China on average € 6 more expensive from January 2026
- No VAT refund for the customer if VAT has not been levied retrospectively at the supplier
- Dutch Court Denies Input VAT Deduction for 2016 Due to Statute of Limitations Expiry
- Preliminary questions to the ECJ in VAT case on the application of the transfer of a totality of assets
- Agreements on the agreement do not lead to intermediary services for financial VAT exemption













