- CV X developed a new construction project and obtained a sales option from housing corporation A in 2010.
- CV X exercised the sales option in 2013.
- The tax authority imposed a VAT assessment on CV X for the years 2013 and 2014.
- CV X argued that the sales of the new construction properties in 2013 fell under the transitional arrangement for the VAT rate increase.
- The lower court agreed with CV X, but the higher court ruled in favor of the tax authority.
- The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the higher court, stating that the transitional measure only applied to agreements for the delivery of a property, not agreements for the exercise of a sales option.
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Mandatory VAT Exemption for Debt Assistance Services from January 2026 if Law Passes Senate
- Mandatory VAT Exemption for Debt Counseling Services Starting January 1, 2026
- EU Trader Portal Outage: ACE and CVA Licenses Not Visible, Workaround Available
- Scheduled Maintenance: Excise Goods Transport (EMCS) Unavailable November 1, 2025, 08:00–10:00 CET
- VAT on Accommodation Increases to 21% from January 1, 2026; Split Rates for Packages


 
        		 
        	











