The Court of Amsterdam decides that director X has rightly been held liable for the turnover tax owed by the company but which has remained unpaid. X has deliberately submitted incorrect VAT returns on behalf of the company. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation unfounded without further motivation (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands: Supreme Court rules on VAT-taxable rental of home office room
- Netherlands Adopts ViDA VAT Registration Rules
- Netherlands: Residential Use Blocks VAT-Taxed Rental of Home Office
- Residential use prevents VAT-taxed rental of office
- Netherlands: Privacy Justifies Secrecy of Third-Party Data in VAT Refund Case
