The Court of Amsterdam decides that director X has rightly been held liable for the turnover tax owed by the company but which has remained unpaid. X has deliberately submitted incorrect VAT returns on behalf of the company. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation unfounded without further motivation (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Submitted audit files in the event of multiple tax fraud do not fall under informal privilege of advisers
- No VAT Deduction for Invoices After Third-Party Attachment in Transport BV Case
- Amsterdam Court: Compensable VAT May Be Included in Municipal Levy Cost Calculations
- No Right to VAT Deduction for Invoiced Services Without Proof of Supply
- Compensable VAT in Municipal Fees Does Not Breach Revenue Limit
