Advocate General Kokott concludes that M sro, as a customer, is only liable for VAT in a triangular transaction if it is stated on the invoice that the tax debt is transferred to her. The mere mention of ‘VAT-exempt intra-Community triangular transaction’ is not sufficient for this.
Source Taxlive
See also ECJ C-247/21 (Luxury Trust Automobil) – AG Opinion – Invoice requirements for triangulation
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on T-366/25 (Szytelbiecka): Divided business gift not a TOGC, requires single, complete transfer
- CJEU (General Court) in Jelgratz (T‑685/24): Clarifying “Own Use” and Excise Duty Treatment of Tobacco Products
- Ine Lejeune/Herman van Kesteren analyse EGC T-221/25 (TUI): ”Implicit VAT Legislation, Legal Certainty and the Right to Property”
- Advocate General Advises EU Court Referral on VAT for Pension Contributions
- EU Strengthens Cross-Border Fight Against VAT Fraud
