Advocate General Kokott concludes that M sro, as a customer, is only liable for VAT in a triangular transaction if it is stated on the invoice that the tax debt is transferred to her. The mere mention of ‘VAT-exempt intra-Community triangular transaction’ is not sufficient for this.
Source Taxlive
See also ECJ C-247/21 (Luxury Trust Automobil) – AG Opinion – Invoice requirements for triangulation
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJ Rules on Customs Valuation for Imports with Provisional Prices: Tauritus Case (C-782/23)
- EDPS Opinion on EPPO and OLAF Access to VAT Data for Combating EU Fraud
- EU Agrees on Temporary €3 Customs Duty for Low-Value E-Commerce Parcels from July 2026
- New InfoCuria case-law database and search tool
- New General Court VAT case – C-903/25 (Grotta Nuova) – No details known yet
