A general partnership operates a web shop for party supplies. It sells to business customers and consumers in the Netherlands and Belgium. The company will be transferred to a BV in 2017. A tax advisor performs administrative activities for the BV. During the annual discussion of the annual figures in 2018, it appears that the BV has met the threshold amount (€ 35,000) for distance sales to Belgian consumers in the third quarter of 2017. exceeded. A VAT return should therefore have been filed in Belgium. It turns out that this should have happened from mid-2016. The tax advisor corrects the error, but is that enough to prevent a claim for damages?
Source: fiscount.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No Defensible Position for VAT Fraudster, Rules Advocate General Van Kempen in Tax Case
- Smoking Cessation Programs Not Exempt from VAT Due to Lack of Required Medical Qualifications
- Payment Not Considered Compensation for Transfer of Generality of Goods, Article 37d Not Applicable
- Reduced VAT Rate Applies to Live Events Featuring Online Communities and Streamers, Court Rules
- Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over VAT Refund Requests for 2018; 2019 Claim Also Denied
