In a case involving a bank claiming it was providing nontaxable “personal or professional services” rather than taxable “automatic data processing,” the Ohio Supreme Court affirmed that the bank failed to show it was providing nontaxable accounting services but also remanded the case to determine whether the “true object” of certain transactions is the provision of customized software.
Source Deloitte
Latest Posts in "United States"
- Georgia Supreme Court Sends Uber Sales Tax Dispute Back to Appeals Court
- Tennessee to Tax International Money Transfers Starting in 2027
- Maryland Restores Sales Tax Exemption for Gold and Silver
- DeWine Pauses New Data Center Tax Exemption Requests
- House Republicans Say Mexico Improperly Taxes U.S. Imports Under USMCA
