According to BV X, a showroom or website was not necessary because the trade often took place in a more or less private setting. According to the District Court, BV X had not made this concrete with objective data. It had not submitted any documents showing how it had attempted to gain a position on the market for exclusive cars and which channels or contacts it had used.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Medical Exemption for Beauty Specialist Treatments
- EU Court Limits VAT Group Exemptions to Individually Recognized Members
- Dutch Beauticians May Qualify for Medical VAT Exemption Under Strict Conditions
- Most Dutch Municipalities Cannot Recover VAT on Asylum Housing Costs
- Dutch Municipalities Cannot Recover Most VAT Costs for Asylum Seeker Housing
