According to the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal had insufficiently motivated its decision that the 39 VAT returns not mentioned in the indictment and the proven statement could be regarded as circumstances under which the five incorrect VAT returns referred to in the proven statement were made and that as a result the other reports showed the large-scale nature of the proven tax offenses
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- AG: no arguable position for own VAT fraud
- Court Rules Against Higher Interest Claims on VAT Refund
- Court: VAT carousel fraud involving false invoices and improper tax deductions
- Smoking Cessation Programs Not Exempt from VAT Due to Lack of Required Medical Qualifications
- Reduced VAT Rate Applies to Live Events Featuring Online Communities and Streamers, Court Rules
