- In a VAT audit over input tax deduction on the purchase of a business jet, the taxpayer sought recusal of the FTA team leader, alleging bias based on an email about the case.
- The Federal Administrative Court held that recusal depends only on whether the official’s conduct objectively creates an appearance of bias, not on whether her substantive tax view was correct.
- The court found the email was factual, merely reflected the procedural status, and did not show a definitive prejudgment; any disputed legal assessment should be challenged in the appeal on the merits, not via recusal.
- Although the FDF slightly breached the right to be heard by not serving the taxpayer with the FTA’s submissions, this defect was cured on appeal.
- The taxpayer’s appeal was dismissed.
Source: bvger.weblaw.ch
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Switzerland"
- Switzerland: Supreme Court on VAT Input Tax Adjustment for Holding Company Investments
- Switzerland: VAT on Football Agent Commissions and Limitation Period Ruling
- Switzerland: VAT Ruling on Educational Services and Spa Rental
- Switzerland Split Over VAT Hike to Fund Extra Pension Payment
- Switzerland Extends 3.8% Special VAT Rate for Hotel Accommodation Until 2031














