- The CJEU in Vaniz (C-121/24) held that EU law does not prevent tax authorities from seeking unpaid VAT from the purchaser even after the supplier has become insolvent and been deleted from the register.
- However, the authority must prove that the purchaser knew or ought to have known, when exercising the right to deduct, that the VAT would not be paid; the supplier’s disappearance does not shift this burden to the purchaser.
- Under Polish law, there are two separate routes for a purchaser’s liability: joint and several liability for certain Annex 15 goods under Article 105a VAT Act/Article 117b Tax Ordinance, and liability for payments to accounts outside the VAT taxpayers’ register under Article 117ba Tax Ordinance.
- For Annex 15 goods, liability applies only where the purchaser knew or had reasonable grounds to suspect non-payment, with statutory defenses available; it does not apply where the supplier’s arrears were unrelated to dishonest tax accounting, and it is excluded for invoices above PLN 15,000 due to mandatory split payment.
- The article also notes that from 1 January 2027 the risk will extend to intangible services.
Source: kancelaria-skarbiec.pl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Austria: EU Court Rejects Late Invoice Fixes in Triangulation VAT Case
- EU Court Rules on Swiss Yacht Repairs, Import VAT and Customs Duties
- Briefing documents & Podcasts: VAT concepts explained through ECJ/CJEU cases on Spotify
- ViDA: Implementation ”Single EU VAT Registration” in the Member States
- EU Ombudsman Probes Hidden VAT Study Ahead of 2027 Reforms













