- The UK Supreme Court refused Bolt permission to appeal in its VAT dispute with HMRC, leaving in place the Court of Appeal ruling that Bolt cannot use the tour operators’ margin scheme (TOMS) in the way it argued.
- HMRC’s position is that Bolt must account for VAT on the full fare rather than only on its commission margin; the disputed VAT is estimated at about £190m.
- The decision effectively ends a long-running case and strengthens HMRC’s stance that ride-hailing platforms are not entitled to TOMS under the existing rules.
- The ruling is likely to affect Uber’s separate but similar VAT challenge over a reported £1bn bill, which has been waiting on the outcome of Bolt’s case.
Source: cityam.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Supreme Court Rejects Bolt Appeal in VAT Margin Scheme Dispute with HMRC
- Flashback on ECJ Cases C-34/99 (Primback) – Interest-free credit does not reduce the retail VAT base
- VAT Planning: Why It Matters
- UK Schedules Maintenance for OSS and IOSS Online Services
- UK Tribunal Examines Holding-Company Input VAT and Non-Economic Activity














