- The CJEU Advocate General in Case C-167/26 RX on input VAT deduction timing recommends that the Court not follow the General Court’s earlier view.
- The case concerns whether EU VAT rules allow a national rule requiring a taxable person to claim input VAT deduction in a return for a specific period.
- The Advocate General says the General Court’s approach would undermine the unity and coherence of EU law.
- The opinion refers to Articles 167, 168(a) and 178(a) of the VAT Directive, along with the principles of VAT neutrality and proportionality.
Source: datenbank.nwb.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Late “Reverse Charge” Invoice Cannot Activate EU Triangular VAT Relief Retroactively
- VAT legislation in the European Union – VAT Directive and Implementing Regulation, VAT Laws of the EU Member States
- Commission to grant temporary trade preferences to support Armenian exports to the EU
- EPPO Dismantles €410 Million VAT Fraud Ring in Eight-Country Raids
- Comments on T-773/25: EU Court Rules Late Reverse-Charge Wording Does Not Retroactively Activate Triangulation Simplification
