- The court found the appeal admissible, but the taxpayer’s objection was correctly declared inadmissible by the inspector, so the appeal itself is unfounded.
- The appeal was filed more than 18 months late, but the taxpayer argued the objection decision had not been properly served, so the appeal period had never started.
- Because the taxpayer disputed receipt, the inspector had to prove proper mailing and delivery; the court held the inspector failed to do so.
- The decision was not properly notified to the former representative as required, meaning the appeal period did not begin.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Flood-Damaged Records Are the Trader’s Risk—VAT Assessment Upheld
- Dutch Court Confirms Gambling Tax Is Not a Prohibited VAT-Type Levy
- Church Not Acting as a VAT Taxable Person: Dutch Court Denies VAT Relief on Building Plot Sale
- Gambling tax for slot machine arcades survives review against VAT Directive and prohibition of discrimination
- Changes to VAT on Motor Vehicle Tax (MRB) in Leasing Agreements














