- The Zeeland-West-Brabant District Court upheld the reversal of the burden of proof against X BV, which faced additional VAT assessments of €1.3 million and €1.1 million due to missing invoices.
- The Court ruled that the additional assessments were not excessively high, as the inspector’s estimates were based on a detailed inspection report, despite X BV’s incomplete administration.
- X BV’s claim that its records were stolen was dismissed, with the Court stating that the theft of administration is at the company’s own risk and expense.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Customs, Excise and VAT on Cigarettes Brought into the Netherlands via Schiphol
- Homeowners Seek Fix for Double VAT on EV Charging via VvE
- No Concurrence Exemption for Share Acquisition in Non-VAT Real Estate Entity
- VAT Exemption for Beautician Treatments Requires Objective Medical Proof
- KOR Applies in 2022: Webshop Owner Faces VAT Assessment
