- Mr Butt’s appeal against a director’s liability for a company penalty due to denial of input VAT under the Kittel principle was dismissed by the FTT.
- The FTT found Mr Butt had “blind-eye” knowledge that Quantum’s transactions were connected to fraudulent VAT evasion, based on his actions, omissions, and prior warnings from HMRC.
- Mr Butt failed to implement adequate due diligence and ignored red flags, despite extensive education from HMRC and a history of involvement in similar fraud with another company.
- Even if blind-eye knowledge was not proven, the FTT held Mr Butt had the means of knowledge to be aware of the fraud.
- The FTT rejected Mr Butt’s arguments regarding penalty calculations and claims of non-discrimination or HMRC profiting.
Source: claritaxnews.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ Statement on Economic Response to Iran War and Cost of Living Support
- Reeves’ VAT Cut Possible Only Thanks to Brexit
- EY on summer VAT cut’s limited but welcome boost for hospitality
- Business leaders say temporary VAT cuts don’t go far enough
- Museums Included in Temporary Summer VAT Cut













