- Procedural aspects, not just substantive arguments, can determine the outcome of tax disputes.
- In the described VAT case, the taxpayer won due to procedural errors by tax authorities, not material issues.
- Tax authorities used procedural tactics, such as delaying proceedings and initiating criminal-fiscal proceedings, mainly to prevent tax liabilities from becoming time-barred.
- The taxpayer’s legal team countered by enforcing procedural guarantees and filing complaints about inactivity and delays.
- The case highlights the importance of understanding and leveraging procedural rules in disputes with tax authorities.
Source: crido.pl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Poland"
- Poland Tax Changes 2026: JPK Deadline Extension, SENT Updates and Key Tax Regulation Developments
- Poland Aligns VAT Rules with ViDA (Directive 2025/516): Expansion of OSS and Clarifications for Digital Trade
- Draft VAT Act Amendments: Greater Flexibility for Export Evidence and Digitalisation of Import Procedures
- Poland Extends Fuel VAT and Excise Duty Reductions Through May 30, 2026
- Eight Detained in Poland Over Suspected EU Digital Innovation Fund Fraud














