- A municipal official abused his position by orchestrating private purchases through suppliers, having invoices routed via a third party (the taxpayer) and then billed to the municipality with a profit margin.
- The court ruled that the official, not the taxpayer, was the actual purchaser, and the taxpayer cannot be considered a commission agent under Dutch VAT law.
- The taxpayer is not entitled to deduct input VAT from the suppliers’ invoices and remains liable for the VAT invoiced to the municipality.
- This results in a significant financial burden for the taxpayer, who faces what is perceived as double taxation, and the municipality is also seeking civil damages for the wrongly invoiced amounts.
- The court suggests the tax inspector consider offsetting any damages paid by the taxpayer to the municipality against the additional VAT assessment to prevent unjust enrichment.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- When Is a Theatre Drink a Separate VAT Supply? Lessons from the Dutch Supreme Court
- Fraudulent Employee Purchases Lead to VAT Liability Without Deduction for Company
- Correct VAT Deduction Revision for Rented Business Building After Transfer, Says Advocate General
- Judge dismisses ChatGPT analysis as evidence of breach of contract
- Court Ruling on VAT Deduction for School Renovation and Penalty Assessment, 20 March 2026













