- The location of a service subject to § 3a Abs. 2 UStG is not in Germany if the service, though ordered by a German liaison office of a company based in a third country, is used for the economic activity at the company’s main seat in the third country.
- The plaintiff’s appeal against the decision of the Berlin-Brandenburg Fiscal Court was dismissed as unfounded.
- The plaintiff, a company based outside the EU operating hotels and resorts, maintained a liaison office in Germany for marketing and sales activities, but the actual hotel services were provided from the main office abroad.
- The plaintiff’s claim for input VAT deduction was denied because no taxable transactions were carried out in Germany.
- The plaintiff must bear the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Source: bundesfinanzhof.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- Germany Approves 2026 Tax Bill Introducing VAT Consolidation Option from 2030
- Lower-Cost Insurance Tariff Brokerage Is VAT-Exempt
- Germany Unveils Action Plan Signaling VAT Reporting System and Extended Archiving Rules
- Factur-X and ZUGFeRD, a technical overview
- Germany Approves Draft Annual Tax Act 2026 With Major VAT Grouping Reform
