- The location of a service subject to § 3a Abs. 2 UStG is not in Germany if the service, though ordered by a German liaison office of a company based in a third country, is used for the economic activity at the company’s main seat in the third country.
- The plaintiff’s appeal against the decision of the Berlin-Brandenburg Fiscal Court was dismissed as unfounded.
- The plaintiff, a company based outside the EU operating hotels and resorts, maintained a liaison office in Germany for marketing and sales activities, but the actual hotel services were provided from the main office abroad.
- The plaintiff’s claim for input VAT deduction was denied because no taxable transactions were carried out in Germany.
- The plaintiff must bear the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Source: bundesfinanzhof.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- Germany and France Announce ZUGFeRD 2.5 E-Invoicing Format with Gross Invoice Support for 2026
- VAT Exemption for Pre-Import Deliveries of Goods (§ 4 No. 4b UStG) – BMF Letter April 2026
- Germany Considers Major VAT Reform: Higher Standard Rate, Lower Reduced Rate, 0% on Essentials
- GEBA: Electronic addresses for all German businesses
- Mandatory B2B E‑Invoicing from 2025 – Practical FAQ Issued by the Bundessteuerberaterkammer














