Comments on ECJ Case T-575/24: VAT Liability of Intermunicipal Telematics Associations Despite “Emanation Theory” in Belgium

• The ECJ ruled in the Digipolis case (T-575/24) that a public law association providing telematics services to its member cities and third parties, for a consideration covering its costs, qualifies as a VAT taxable person, even if it doesn’t aim for profit.
• The Court determined Digipolis conducted a continuous, independent activity for consideration, similar to private entities, and did not act as a public authority exercising public prerogatives, despite its public law status and limited autonomy due to its founders.
• The judgment rejects the Belgian “theory of emanation,” which treated services between such public associations and their members as internal and not subject to VAT, affirming that the EU VAT Directive does not allow for such an exclusion.

Source Pawel Mikula

---

• The General Court (EuG) addressed the issue of inter-municipal cooperation and the use of administrative constructs to classify services as “internal transactions” exempt from VAT.
• The Belgian “emanation theory” treats services provided by an association to its members as if the members provided the services to themselves.
• The Court clarified that such national legal fictions cannot override EU VAT law; only the criteria in Articles 2, 9, and 13 of the VAT Directive 2006/112/EC are decisive.
• Public law entities acting as commissioned associations providing telematics services and related hardware to their members are subject to EU VAT rules.

Source: datenbank.nwb.de

Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.

---

---