- The High Court refused the Commissioner of Taxation’s appeal in the Geocon case, making the Full Federal Court’s decision crucial for interpreting GST refunds, particularly concerning overpaid GST under Division 142 of the GST Act.
- The Geocon case involved a property developer who overpaid GST by incorrectly calculating the margin scheme, failing to account for non-monetary consideration, and argued that this “excess GST” was not “passed on” to purchasers because sale prices were market-driven.
- The Full Federal Court ruled that whether excess GST is “passed on” depends on actual pricing conduct, not general assumptions about profitability, and that refunding Geocon’s overpaid GST would not constitute a “windfall gain,” providing critical guidance on Division 142’s application.
Source KPMG
Latest Posts in "Australia"
- Government Announces Additional Fuel Excise Cut and GST Windfall Return for Motorists and Businesses
- ATO Urges Businesses to Review GST Turnover, Update Reporting Methods Before July 2026
- EU-Australia Free Trade Deal Boosts Exports, Faces Criticism Over Agricultural Quotas and Protections
- EU and Australia strengthen relations with Trade Agreement
- Customs valuation obligations in related party transactions
