- The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania ruled that a company was involved in VAT fraud due to ignoring clear signs of fraud and failing to perform basic due diligence on its contractors.
- The court emphasized that taxpayers are directly responsible for verifying the identity and authority of their contracting parties and cannot rely solely on state institution assessments.
- The court held that expenses related to transactions with fraudulent documents cannot be recognized for tax purposes unless independent evidence is provided.
- The applicant failed to collect necessary information about its contractors and continued transactions even after the death of a contractor’s director, with documents still being issued in the deceased’s name.
- The court agreed with the tax administrator that the applicant likely knew or should have known about the VAT fraud.
Source: vatabout.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Lithuania"
- Amendment to Commentary on Article 21 of the Value Added Tax Law
- Lithuania’s Fiscalization Rules for Vending Machines
- Application of Personal Income Tax Rules to VAT Payers Using the Small Business Scheme in Lithuania
- EU Finance Ministers Discuss VAT Data Access, Market Integration, Ukraine Aid, and Anti-Fraud Measures
- Commentary on the Law of Value Added Tax of the Republic of Lithuania (2004–2026)














