- The report analyzes the artificial interposition of “YY SA” to deduct input VAT for works on properties used by “XX SA” for teaching activities.
- “XX SA” cannot deduct input VAT because teaching is VAT-exempt.
- The arrangement is deemed artificial, with its only effect being to allow “YY SA” to claim VAT deductions that “XX SA” could not.
- The Advisory Commission concludes this constitutes a conflict in the application of the tax rule.
Source: sede.agenciatributaria.gob.es
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Spain"
- ECJ VAT Case – C-512/26 (Commission v Spain) – Action – VAT rates reform: failure to transpose Directive (EU) 2022/542
- ECJ VAT Case – C-504/26 (Commission v Spain) – Action – Small enterprises VAT scheme: failure to transpose Directive (EU) 2020/285
- When Can Holding Companies Deduct Input VAT?
- AEAT Schedules 10 September 2026 Developer Webinar on Public E‑Invoicing Solution (SPFE) Updates
- Spain Proposes Higher Taxes and Stricter Rules for Short-Term Rentals
