📌 Summary of What Consultants Agree On
✔ No separate VAT-able service
AG Kokott clearly views contractual TP adjustments as not constituting separate supplies unless a specific service can be identified and linked to consideration.
✔ But VAT taxable amount can change
If the TP adjustment reflects:
- a variable purchase price,
- agreed contractually, and
- linked to original supply,
then the adjustment may increase or reduce the VAT taxable amount.
✔ VAT treatment depends heavily on contract + economic reality
- the contractual mechanism,
- presence/absence of a direct link between payment and service,
- whether the TP adjustment is purely profit allocation or part of purchase price structuring.
New AG Opinion in Stellantis (C‑603/24): Transfer Pricing meets VAT (again
- AG Kokott confirms that contractual TP adjustments are not automatically a separate supply for VAT.
- They affect only the taxable amount when linked to a variable purchase price agreed upfront, aligning with Articles 73 and 90 VAT Directive.
- A separate VAT supply arises only if an identifiable service for consideration exists.
- The Portuguese tax authority had argued the adjustment amounted to a service by the purchaser.
Source: VATfaq’s summary & analysis [vatfaqs.com]
A‑G advises: no separate transfer pricing supply of services without a contract
- Baker Tilly confirms AG Kokott’s view: price adjustments are not a supply of services if no contract exists linking consideration to a specific service.
- Adjustments may still modify the taxable amount of the original supply, but they do not trigger VAT as a stand‑alone service.
- They outline three possible CJEU outcomes (taxable, non‑taxable, hybrid) and conclude AG Kokott favors “not taxable”.
Source: Baker Tilly insight article [bakertilly.nl]
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ/CJEU/General Court VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
- Podcasts & briefing documents: VAT concepts explained through ECJ/CJEU cases on Spotify
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Reevaluating EDIFACT Exclusion in B2B E-Invoicing under ViDA
- CJEU Rules Loyalty Points Are Not Vouchers for VAT Purposes, Treated as Discounts Instead
- CJEU Rules In-Game Gold Sales Subject to VAT, Not Exempt as Currency or Voucher
- Comments on ECJ C-472/24: Court Rules Virtual Gold Not Exempt from VAT
- Comments on ECJ C-436/24 (Lyko): Court Rules Loyalty Points Do Not Qualify as Vouchers













