- The ECJ ruled that VAT liability must follow the actual supplier of services, not a “designated partner” under national partnership rules if that partner did not supply the services.
- Member States cannot reallocate VAT debts through administrative mechanisms that do not reflect economic reality.
- The VAT Directive requires that VAT is owed by the entity that independently supplies the service in its own name and bears the economic risk.
- In the case, the branches that contracted with customers and supplied services were the taxable persons, not Česká síť, despite national rules suggesting otherwise.
- Internal or contractual arrangements do not override the factual VAT analysis; only the actual supplier is liable for VAT.
Source: globalvatcompliance.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Briefing Document & Podcast: VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) – Digital Reporting Requirements
- VAT and Transfer Pricing: Lessons for Multinationals (ECJ Cases: Weatherford, Arcomet, Högkullen, Stellantis)
- Transfer Pricing, VAT and Transactions Between Related Entities: Key Principles from CJEU Case Law (Stellantis Portugal, C‑603/24)
- EU ViDA Implementation Strategy: Six Implementing Acts Shaping DRR, VIES and OSS Roll-Out (2027–2030)
- Comments on ECJ C-603/24 (Stellantis Portugal) – Transfer pricing and VAT: Court confirms in Stellantis that not every true-up constitutes a service













