- The court ruled that Stichting X could not derive any legitimate expectation of a right to deduct input VAT from the tax authority’s actions or communications.
- Stichting X only provided an interest-bearing mortgage loan and performed no taxable activities.
- The court confirmed that input VAT deduction is only allowed for taxable activities, which Stichting X did not perform.
- The invitation to file VAT returns did not create a justified expectation of the right to deduct input VAT.
- Stichting X’s appeal was dismissed.
Source: taxlive.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Interim use of horse does not preclude the application of zero rate for export
- Limburg Worries About Higher VAT on Flowers and Plants
- Tax Fraud Conviction for VAT Filing Offenses
- Zero-Rate VAT Applies to Horse Export Despite Interim EU Competition Use
- No reliance on tax adviser where VAT invoices were not provided on time
