- Court ruling on the right to deduct VAT for fixed asset reconstruction
- Case involves a dispute over a tax administrator’s decision
- Applicant’s right to deduct VAT for reconstruction and services was denied
- Local tax administrator claimed assets were transferred without remuneration
- Supreme Administrative Court questioned the applicant’s intention for taxable activity
- No obligation to adjust VAT deduction was raised
- Core dispute centered on the intention to use assets in taxable activity
- Objective evidence from the tax audit was crucial in the case
Source: vatabout.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Lithuania"
- Amendment to Lithuanian VAT Law Regarding Reduced Tax Rates and Exemptions
- EU Closes Infringement Case Against Lithuania Over VAT Rates Directive Implementation
- Lithuanian Court Rules on VAT Liability in Joint Activity Agreements
- ECJ Advocate General: VAT Applies to Lithuanian In-Game Currency Resale Profits
- ECJ C-472/24 (Žaidimų valiuta) – AG Opinion – VAT Treatment of In-Game Gold Transactions
