- Court ruling on the right to deduct VAT for fixed asset reconstruction
- Case involves a dispute over a tax administrator’s decision
- Applicant’s right to deduct VAT for reconstruction and services was denied
- Local tax administrator claimed assets were transferred without remuneration
- Supreme Administrative Court questioned the applicant’s intention for taxable activity
- No obligation to adjust VAT deduction was raised
- Core dispute centered on the intention to use assets in taxable activity
- Objective evidence from the tax audit was crucial in the case
Source: vatabout.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Lithuania"
- VAT Fraud: Tax Administrator’s Role and Legal Challenges in Fraudulent Transactions
- Lithuania to Implement EU-Compliant E-Invoicing Nationwide by 2028 for Modernized Tax Reporting
- e-Invoicing in Lithuania: Timeline, Guidelines, Process, and Steps for Implementation
- Lithuania to Adjust VAT Rates for Tourism, Transport, Culture, and Publishing by 2026
- Fiscalization and VAT Treatment of EV Chargers in Lithuania: Key Considerations and Obligations