- Court ruling on the right to deduct VAT for fixed asset reconstruction
- Case involves a dispute over a tax administrator’s decision
- Applicant’s right to deduct VAT for reconstruction and services was denied
- Local tax administrator claimed assets were transferred without remuneration
- Supreme Administrative Court questioned the applicant’s intention for taxable activity
- No obligation to adjust VAT deduction was raised
- Core dispute centered on the intention to use assets in taxable activity
- Objective evidence from the tax audit was crucial in the case
Source: vatabout.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Lithuania"
- Lithuania Reduces VAT on Menstrual Hygiene Products Effective January 2027
- ECJ C-472/24 (Žaidimų valiuta) – Judgment – VAT Exemption Denied for Virtual Money Transactions
- EPPO Raids Lithuanian Electronics Firms Over Suspected €7 Million VAT Fraud
- Lithuanian Supreme Court: Taxpayer Liable for VAT Fraud Due to Lack of Due Diligence
- Lithuanian Court Rules on VAT Fraud: Missing Traders, Due Diligence, and Tax Deductibility













