- Impact Contracting Solutions Limited used 3300 mini-umbrella companies to supply labor.
- HMRC found the arrangements between ICSL and the MUCs to be contrived.
- MUCs failed to account for VAT charged on supplies to ICSL.
- HMRC denied ICSL the right to recover VAT due to fraudulent evasion.
- HMRC informed ICSL of VAT registration cancellation for facilitating fraud.
- ICSL appealed against the denial of input tax recovery and deregistration.
- ICSL argued Ablessio applies only to those defaulting on their own obligations.
- Court of Appeal ruled HMRC can deregister those involved in VAT fraud.
- Deregistration must be proportionate and not breach EU VAT principles.
- ICSL’s appeal on the preliminary issue of law was dismissed.
- Further consideration needed on whether ICSL’s circumstances justify deregistration.
Source: taxscape.deloitte.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ Statement on Economic Response to Iran War and Cost of Living Support
- Reeves’ VAT Cut Possible Only Thanks to Brexit
- EY on summer VAT cut’s limited but welcome boost for hospitality
- Business leaders say temporary VAT cuts don’t go far enough
- Museums Included in Temporary Summer VAT Cut













