- The director of the appellant company created the ‘Kinsey System’ for hair augmentation and wig adaptation for women with significant hair loss
- HMRC disagreed that the supply of wigs and services fell under zero-rating for VAT
- The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) determined that the Kinsey System did not qualify as a service adapting goods for disabled persons
- Significant hair loss in women was not considered a disability in itself
- The FTT dismissed the appeal and upheld HMRC’s assessments and notices of amendment
Source: rpc.co.uk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Abbey Group v HMRC: FTT Rejects Legitimate Expectation VAT Appeal
- VAT Refunds from the United Kingdom
- UK Budget to Extend Marketplace Deemed Supplier VAT Rules to Domestic Sellers
- Flashback on ECJ Cases C-409/98 (Mirror Group) – Tenant inducements are not exempt property letting
- UK e-invoicing briefing: what the April 2029 mandate means for businesses














