The dispute concerns whether the taxpayer’s supply of the Kinsey system, which provides services to adapt goods (wigs) to suit the condition of clients suffering from significant hair loss, is zero rated under VATA 1994 Schedule 8 Group 12 as ‘Drugs, medicines, aids for the disabled, etc.’. The taxpayer argued that significant hair loss in women should be considered a disability in itself, but the decision refers to HMRC guidance that ‘chronically sick or disabled’ does not include an elderly person who is not disabled or chronically sick or any person who’s only temporarily disabled or incapacitated.
Source KPMG
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Announces New Steel Trade Measure to Protect Domestic Industry from 2026
- HMRC Launches Custom OTT Notification Feature for Tariff Changes
- UT classifies O’Neill wetsuits as textile garments, overturning lower-duty rubber classification
- HMRC Updates Guidance on Post-Clearance Amendments to Import Declarations
- Healthspan Ltd – UT – Admissibility of Expert Evidence in £56 Million VAT Dispute













