- ECJ rules on whether a subsidiary can be a fixed establishment for VAT purposes
- A fixed establishment is characterized by permanence and structure in terms of resources
- Supplies between a fixed establishment and its head office are generally not subject to VAT
- The SC Adient case involved two group companies, Adient Germany and Adient Romania
- Adient Romania provided services to Adient Germany, which were considered VAT taxable in Germany
- Romanian tax authorities considered Adient Romania to be a fixed establishment of Adient Germany
Source: bdo.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- When Is User Data-for-Access a Taxable Barter Transaction Under EU VAT Rules?
- It’s a wrap: Turning E‑Invoicing and E‑Reporting Mandates into Business Opportunities
- Comments on ECJ C-436/24 (Lyko): Court Rules Loyalty Points Do Not Qualify as Vouchers
- EGC Customs T-589/24: No partial exemption from import duties in outward processing
- CJEU: OPR Import Duty Exemption Requires Export via Authorized Customs Office Only
