According to the Advocate General, internal transactions within the VAT group do not fall within the scope of VAT or are not VATable according to German
terminology. If the CJEU adopts this view, then the German view on VAT groups with regard to nontaxable intra-group transactions can remain (as before). However, it remains to be seen whether the CJEU will actually follow the Advocate General’s arguments.
Directive 77/388/EEC (6th Directive) is still applicable to the facts of the case before the CJEU, as can be seen from the question referred by the BFH. Ultimately, however, this does not play a decisive role, as the VAT Directive does not contain any decisive changes in this respect either, so that the CJEU’s decision should also be transferable to later disputes that have to be resolved with the successor regulation in the VAT Directive.
Source KPMG
See also
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ECJ Adviser: Transfer Pricing Adjustments Not Subject to VAT in Stellantis Case
- HS Code Updates 2026: Key Changes Impacting Product Classification and Customs Compliance
- Comprehensive Guide to European Extended Producer Responsibility: Navigating Over 30 EPR Streams and Obligations
- CBAM Costs: Why Importers Face Uncertainty From €80 to €700 Per Ton
- EU VAT Gap Worsens in 2023: Compliance and Policy Challenges Across Member States












