The dispute is about whether VAT should be paid on the partially recharged third-party liability insurance premium to the Staff Partnership. The court ruled that the hospital does not provide the indemnity service, as it is carried out by the insurer, so the recharged premium is not subject to VAT. The court also stated that there are no other relevant services in this case.
Source Taxence
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands: VAT Deduction Dispute for Municipal Entrepreneurs Fund Foundation
- VAT zero rate for export of competition horse to Malaysia
- Netherlands: Bicycle Maintenance Package Qualifies as Separate Service at Reduced VAT Rate
- Entrepreneurs’ fund does not meet conditions for approval of VAT deduction
- Netherlands: Export Zero Rate Denied for Sport Horse Used in EU Competitions
