The Amsterdam Court of Appeal upheld the ruling that X’s permit to act as a limited fiscal representative and the Article 23 permit were rightly revoked. X was transporting goods to EU countries other than the UK for Chinese companies without a permanent establishment in Europe, and listing them on the UK VAT number, which deprived EU authorities of their supervisory functions. The court found this conduct sufficient ground for revocation of the permits, and ruled that the withdrawals did not infringe the principle of proportionality.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Advocate General Advises EU Court Referral on VAT for Pension Contributions
- NOB Criticizes New ViDA VAT Rules for Unnecessary Complexity and Implementation Delays
- Dutch Court Finds VAT Fiscal Representative Requirement Discriminatory for Foreign Entrepreneurs
- NOB Criticizes New ViDA VAT Reverse Charge Rules as Unnecessarily Complex for Dutch Businesses
- Netherlands E-Invoicing: 2026 Key Dates, Compliance Layers, and Upcoming Mandates Explained
