The 1986 Rompelman judgment revolves around the question of whether someone can be regarded as an entrepreneur for VAT purposes.
This judgment established important criteria for qualifying as an entrepreneur for VAT purposes, as well as when entrepreneurship begins. Before an entrepreneur actually starts his economic activity, preparatory acts can already be considered as entrepreneurial activities.
- Practical consequences
- Consequences for entrepreneurs who have solar panels and have therefore registered for the small business scheme (KOR).
Source: www.btwinstituut.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Liability of Dutch Kadaster’s Tactical Management Services for DSO-LV under Economic Activity Criteria
- Court Divided on VAT Abuse: Car Sales to Directors at Below-Market Prices and Tax Implications
- Dutch Supreme Court: Abuse of Law in VAT on Underpriced Car Sale by Holding Company to DGA
- Dutch Supreme Court Rejects VAT Refund Appeal; Lower Court Ruling Upheld Without Further Explanation
- Netherlands Raises VAT on Short-Stay Accommodation to 21% Effective January 2026
