- Recipient informed BV X in a letter dated March 5, 2019 that an amount of €1,678.66 was offset against outstanding tax liabilities and costs
- BV X objected to the offset but was declared inadmissible by the recipient
- Court rulings upheld the decision against BV X
- BV X failed to pay the required court fees on time, leading to dismissal of their appeal
- Despite claims of not receiving the fee notification, BV X’s appeal was rejected
- BV X appealed to the Supreme Court, questioning the reliability of PostNL’s track & trace data for registered mail delivery
- The Attorney General expressed concerns over the reliability of PostNL’s delivery of registered mail, citing various weaknesses in the system
- The Attorney General believes that the current burden of proof and weak evidence based on track & trace data provide sufficient protection for serious legal seekers
- The Supreme Court’s counter-evidence rule may be difficult to apply in this case
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
