The Court of Appeal of ‘s-Hertogenbosch ruled that X cannot rely on a 1995 audit for applying the reduced VAT rate to fishing lure feed. X failed to demonstrate authorization for applying the reduced rate. The audit report did not mention the applicable rate for fish bait, and there is no implicit approval for the reduced rate. X’s action is currently justified due to the admissibility of the cross-appeal she has filed.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Principle of legitimate expectations prevents additional VAT assessment of contractors
- VAT-Exempt Rental of Padel and Squash Courts?
- AG: No VAT Education Exemption for Foundation Lending Teachers
- Netherlands Plans Peppol-Based E-Invoicing and Digital Reporting Under ViDA
- May 2026 NPa Validation Artefacts for SI-UBL 2 / NLCIUS and Peppol BIS 3 – Mandatory from 17 August 2026














